The
Ministry of Industry (DGE/SBDU) has communicated
on its website the provisions of the
regulations in force (updated on
19.05.2022).
Ranking
of the BDU in the Customs Tariff (CN)
In
his guide
on the export of dual-use items published on its website, the
indicates that each tariff heading
corresponding to an asset that may fall within the scope of the
regulation of BDUs, is associated with a positive referral
a code (known as the National Additional Code = CANA) indicating
that a control regulation may be imposed on it.
applicable. This system is a
operator information system and a control tool
for the customs service; It is based on the "table of justice".
correlation" between the codes of the nomenclature
combined with those on the dual-use list.
Also
The "Consultation" database
TARIC" online on the European Union website,
that mentions the BDU codes at the bottom of the page of the sections
"restrictions", is based on this correlation table set
updated annually by the European Commission and
feeds, in terms of the classification of goods in duplicate
use, national computer reporting systems
customs duties of the Member States .
That
table remains inaccurate because the BDU codes do not match
than in the articles or the first paragraphs of the list of
dual-use items, while
latest version of this list of BDUs
are made up of multiple paragraphs and subparagraphs
Alphanumeric. In addition, it fosters the suspicions of the
Customs Controllers' Share Resulting in Blockages
of goods free for export and without
Can be used in manufacturing or use
weapons of mass destruction or their means of delivery; or
Again, from the Directorate-General of the Treasury of the
Ministry of Finance, untimely blockages
advance payments or payments impeding exports while
to be lawful.
Licenses
Export
Dual-use items are considered
as being subject to prohibitions within the meaning of Article
38 of the Customs Code, but may benefit from
Derogations for export and transit operations
and brokering, in the form of individual licences,
general or global, now issued by the
dual-use assets of the
companies of the Ministry of Industry (DGE),
after any opinion of the Intermediary Committee on
dual-use items.
Operation
customs controls
In
application of the Customs Code, customs offices
carry out documentary (or physical) checks as soon as
the declaration or go back four months
(1st level ex-post controls), while the
regional and national surveys are three years in
Rear (2nd level ex-post controls). Exporting
without a dual-use licence, or any
constituting an "export without declaration"
prohibited goods" within the meaning of Article 426 of the Customs Code is
considered to be a customs offence under the second
paragraph of Article 414 of the Customs Code. This
Additional paragraph of Article 414 of the Customs Code
(effective January 1, 2014) is the result of
Law 2011-266 of 14 March 2011
pursuant to Article 24 of Regulation No 2021/821
inviting Member States to legislate on
the application of this European text. They can drive
the seizure of the goods (and their means of transport)
transport), the interception by customs of
goods in transit, fines of up to
three times the value of the goods, as well as a
Maximum prison sentence of 5 years.
In
Application of Article
411-6 of the Criminal Code, offences for the act of delivering or making accessible to a foreign power, to a foreign or foreign-controlled enterprise or organization or to their agents any information, processes, objects, documents, computerized data or files the exploitation, disclosure or collection of which ... , resulting in
even harsher penalties may be noted
by judicial customs officers, or police officers
with retroactivity of ten years.
Ranking
"Unlicensed" goods
The
Dual-Use Classification (DUB) Competence
is now part of the new department of the DGE.
However, the documentary and physical control of the
goods declared for export remainder of the
Customs Administration (DGDDI) which
can apply the rules of prohibitions; Similarly,
Financial Settlements for Exports, Transit and
brokerage may be controlled by the general management
Treasury and Economic Policy Department (DGTPE) and
be subject to prohibitions. Any operation wrong
can thus lead to suspicions on the part of the
administrative authorities leading to delays or
to unnecessary hassle.
In his guide to
the export of dual-use items,
The customs administration recommends that manufacturers
ask the DGCIS (SBDU) to confirm rankings
Negative effects of non-affected high-tech products
through the manufacture of weapons of mass destruction, in order to
avoid barriers to exports. It consults with the
SBDU in case of doubt about the strategic nature of a
product, material, or equipment.
This
procedure presents the risk to the exporter of obtaining
an arbitrary ban on the export of its equipment in
Application of the provisions of the "catch-all clause"
if they apply to the SBDU for classification, or a
Blocking in customs for several weeks of the
declared goods, or even a financial blockage of the
on the part of the Directorate-General of the Treasury.
The
property assimilated to BDU
|
|
The
Restrictive export measures on goods
other than those on the European list of duplicate goods
use but also subject to prohibitions in the
meaning of Article 38 of the Customs Code. In the event of their
export without a license, so they are also
liable to penalties under section 414
(2) of the Customs Code.
The
"catch-all clause"
The article
4 of the so-called "catch-all clause" regulation gives
The power of Member States to ban exports
goods not included in the list given in Annex I, "if
Supervisory authorities are aware of a risk
misuse of the property for the purpose of production or
the use of weapons of mass destruction or
their vectors". In this case, the DGE notifies
This prohibition on the person concerned and the goods is
prohibited within the meaning of Article 38 of the French Securities Code,
customs, or requires the issuance of a licence
for use control
final. The reasons for that prohibition shall not be stated in accordance with the
the
provisions of Article L311-5 of the French Securities and Exchange Code.
relations between the public and the administration, because it results from France's foreign policy.
The
violation of this prohibition is considered to be an "export"
without declaration of prohibited goods" subject to severe criminal penalties under the
Article 414 of the Customs Code.
This
clause also applies if the exporter is informed
possible misuse for malicious purposes of a
equipment or technology that is free for export.
Based on the definition of duplicate property
use given by the SBDU, in accordance with this regulation
European dual-use items are:
"Property,
equipment - including technologies,
software, intangible or intangible know-how
– likely to have both civilian use
military or capable - in whole or in part
- Contribute to the development, production,
handling, operation, maintenance,
storage, detection, identification,
Dissemination of
mass destruction" (WMD - nuclear, biological,
chemicals, etc.).
The official definition is given in
Article 4 of Regulation No 2021/821, as amended, by that
sentence:
"... the property in question is or
may be intended, in whole or in part, to contribute to
development, production, handling,
operation, maintenance, storage,
detection, identification or dissemination
chemical, biological or nuclear weapons, or
other nuclear explosive devices or
development, production, maintenance or
storage of missiles that can be used as delivery systems for
such weapons."
The term "mass destruction"
corresponds, for example, to the devastation caused by two
World Wars and Local Wars in Vietnam,
in Iran and Iraq, in Aghanistan, or for the past two years in
Syria. These terrible conflicts have led to
the extermination of populations in cities or valleys
Whole.
Also, from a legal point of view, the 'catch-all clause' in Article 4
of Regulation No 2021/821 as amended may be implemented
for goods not listed in Annex I to that regulation,
but still capable of producing
equivalent extermination costs.
This
"catch-all clause" results from transposition into law
at the same time:
- from
MTCR Directive No. 7;
- some
Australia Group General Provisions 1a and 1b
;
- of a
Decision taken on 28 May 2004 at the end of the session
NSG plenary in Goteberg, Sweden.
The MTCR recommends that
governments to control "exports"
intended to be used, in whole or in conjunction with
with systems for launching weapons of destruction
other than manned aircraft."
However, this does not preclude an airliner intended for
Be piloted by suicidal and inexperienced pirates
with sophisticated navigation systems
included in the list of dual-use items for the purpose of
Hitting a precise target at a speed of 800 km/h
Civilian helicopters, tear gas and
Other
The assets in question, which can be used for the
law enforcement, are regulated
national regulations in accordance with the regulations
European Dual-Use Items, which allows
Member States to publish
restrictive regulations for reasons of
security.
Procedures and controls have also been
the same for those goods not included in the
European.
Embargoed goods (
North Corea, Russia, etc.)
|
|
Some
regulations made pursuant to resolutions of the Council
United Nations Security and Foreign Policy
and the European Union's Common Security Agreements prohibit
imports and exports of goods
listed in the annexes, or allow derogations, under
in the form of licences, for proven civilian uses. The
licensing and control procedures are
the same as in the case of dual-use items.
The
restrictive measures against these countries result from
of the many resolutions passed by the Council of
United Nations security. Those against Iran were
following the adoption of the resolution
No. 1929 of 9 June 2010 by the Council of
security of the United Nations, through a decision
of the Council of the European Union of 26
July 2010, published in the Official Journal of the Union
European Union No. L 195 of 27 July 2010.
Now, the
countries subject to international sanctions are subject to
a table of import and/or export trade restrictions published by the
Directorate General of Customs and Excise Taxes;
All
Export restrictive measures are detailed
and regularly updated on the site
of the Directorate-General of the Treasury of the
Ministry of Finance.
Countries
whose property is subject to prohibitions
published by
the European Union in application of sanctions
are cited in
The Restrictions section
of the
DG of the Treasury.
The
countries concerned are: Belarus, North Korea,
Iran, Iraq, Russia, Somalia, Syria and Venezuela.
The
U.S. Subject Goods
Export Control
|
|
U.S. regulation of
Export Controls East
reproduced in the pages of this site entitled:
Export constraints are not only
in accordance with EU rules
European Union on Dual-Use Items (and on Dual-Use Goods
subject to restrictive measures), but also US
(for goods of US origin re-exported to other countries)
destinations) in accordance with the Export Administration
Regulations (EAR) published in Chapter VII of the Electronic
Code of Federal Registrations (eCFR), as the United States
consider their legislation to be applicable worldwide
whole.
Export
Administration Regulations (EAR)
The
USA, Strategic Goods Fall Under Section 774 of Export
Administration Regulation (EAR) in the Electronic Code of Federal
Regulations (eCFR) ,
which is titled Trade
Control List (CCL), and whose
Classification numbers, called Export Control Classification Number (ECCN) are coded on the same principle as the list
European dual-use goods, i.e.
Annex I to Regulation No 2021/821. But to these articles
and paragraphs from the lists published by the schemes
multilateral control panels, the U.S. is adding
headings called:
- "9x500
Series" and '600 Series' in force
since the Export Control Reform (ECR) of 24 May 2013 with regard to ship components
and satellites not included in the list
(USML) of the U.S. War Materiel Regulations.
- "
Other Series" for various security reasons,
in particular for the fight against terrorism;
These three lists added to the
Multilateral Counter-Arms Regimes
Mass destruction correspond respectively to
goods produced in the USA for which a license is
U.S. export is required for various
Reasons depending on the country of destination or
addressee.
These lists, although quite complete in this respect,
that relates to the strategic nature of the assets in question
are not exhaustive and do not preclude the application of
The "catch-all clause" for goods
suspected of a malicious destination.
Last updated in March 2024
© Albert Castel - April
2010
|
|
|